Archive for March, 2011

Government Sees $24B in Profit From Bailouts, Cost Savers Over $100B in Interest Alone

From Bloomberg

The Treasury Department said today the U.S. government’s financial rescue programs will earn a combined profit of about $24 billion, based on current market conditions.

It doesn’t take too much skepticism to think about the ways in which the Governments assessment of gains and losses may fall short. Consider Obama Treasury Celebrates Bailout Profits While Ignoring Costs, Legacy which summarizes

Treasury did not, however, commemorate the hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer aid left to be repaid; the billions the Troubled Asset Relief Program will ultimately cost taxpayers; the extraordinary actions of the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that made Treasury’s bank profits possible; or the fact that the entire enterprise of pumping taxpayer cash into a financial system rife with unrecognized losses will likely be remembered as a “dismal failure,” 

The article goes on to highight outstanding TARP loans to auto companies and insurance companies, $267B in outstanding FDIC insured debt, QE2 and the fact that 9 out of 10 new home loans are guaranteed by the Government.


I’ve always thought one of the most under-appreciated costs of the bailout and 0% interest rates was the costs to Savers. The Fed’s Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) has had damaging effects on Savers in a broad fashion.



Lower overall interest rates from treasuries to corporates to munis have reduced the income available for bond owners. It’s hard to quantitatively measure the impact of this. We can, however, estimate the cost that effectively 0% interest has had on savers via the pool of Money Market Funds. My back of the envelope analysis:

  • From November 2008 to date, Total Money Market Assets have averaged $3.263 Trillion (Investment Company Institute).
  • Just prior to November 2008, the average yield on 1mo CDs was 2.07%. Today it stands at 0.13% (Bankrate.com).
  • At 2.07%, Savers would have accumulated $164 Billion in interest on their Assets. With rates at 0.13% today, a conservatively guestimated weighted average yield over that period is 0.75% This has netted Savers only $59.74 Billion or $100 Billion less than would have otherwise been the case.

Of course, the longer that ZIRP continues, the more it will continue to cost Savers on their currently $2.7 Trillion in Money Market Savings, earning a measly 0.13%.


Make no mistake, the Government bailouts in no way collectively benefited tax payers when you consider all the costs and benefits. While some costs and consequences are unknown and yet to be entirely borne out, the cost to Savers has been clear.

Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions. Any links to Amazon.com may result in compensation to the author via the Amazon Associates program.

Driving in Traffic: Lane Changers vs. Staying the Course

Everyone is sitting in stop and go traffic on the highway. We are all trying to get to our destination and we can’t be there soon enough. For some it’s financial independence, for others it’s retirement, the ability to leave a legacy, or give back to the world; for other’s still, it’s just piece of mind knowing they don’t have to worry about how much they have. That’s the destination.

But what is the best way to get there?  In the 80s and 90s it seemed pretty easy. Get on the Interstate, put on cruise control, and turn the music up. Good times. Since then, it seems we’ve been in stop and go traffic.

The highway has so many lanes today. It used to be just 3. Stocks, bonds, and cash. Today, we can choose to drive in any number of lanes– Growth stocks, value stocks, mid cap, small cap, Developed International stocks and bonds, Emerging Markets stocks and bonds, Real Asset such as Commodities or Gold, Real Estate, Currencies the list goes on– but they all have stop and go traffic. Even the privileged, exclusive carpool lanes (Hedge Funds, Private Equity, Venture Capital) are crowded and prone to pile-ups these days.

It’s tempting to take the passive approach and just pick a lane and stick to it. After all, nobody can predict which lane is going to move faster and for exactly how long… besides it’s so much less stressful. There is also less risk of accident.  Changing lanes carries risks. And as we’ve all heard thousands of times before, if you just stick with it for the “long-term” you’ll be rewarded with average drive-times and get to your destination in one piece. Stay the course. Nobel prizes have been awarded and successful investment management business have been run according to these theories.

But something doesn’t seem right here. You’ve been sitting in the large cap growth stock lane for 10 years and haven’t gone anywhere! What if the lane you are in is closed up ahead and you don’t even know it? You could be sitting at a standstill for a long-time and risk never making it to your destination. Maybe changing lanes isn’t so risky, maybe the biggest risk is doing nothing at all?

So you’re fed up, tired of sitting in the slow lane and you see that other lane, moving so smartly. Emerging markets stocks/Gold/LT Treasuries. Wow, if you were in that lane, you’d probably be there by now. So you give in and go– make the move– and now your moving! It feels great! Then before you know it. Brake lights. Slowing, slowing, BANG. Rear-ended. What happened?

The lane was moving, but what happens when everybody moves into that lane? Maybe there was a huge pothole in that lane up ahead and everybody was too busy congratulating themselves for being in the right lane to see it. Multi-car pile-up. Traffic timers are a dangerous bunch. Zipping from one lane to the next not knowing what may lie ahead.

So what is the right course of action? Stay in the same lane for too long and you risk being in a dead-end strategy. Change lanes too frequently or erratically and you risk financial accidents.

The answer, as usual, lies somewhere in between. You need to develop the skills and experience required to safely and opportunistically change lanes. You need to know your blind spots and what risks may be hidden there. You need to be able to look through the rear-view mirror to understand what has occurred in the past and how it might impact the road ahead. Most importantly, you need the forward vision necessary to ANTICIPATE both the major road blocks and sections of open road. Lastly, you need to have the proper temperament to resist making the wrong move at the wrong time. Of course, you can always hire a chauffeur with the proper approach to drive for you.


Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions. Any links to Amazon.com may result in compensation to the author via the Amazon Associates program.

Expensive Markets Mean Low or Negative Prospective Returns (updated)

As discussed in previous posts, the benefit of a normalized P/E ratio (and a historical perspective) is that it gives us cues on whether the current price of the market is cheap or expensive and thus whether future returns will be high or low.

The S&P 500 Normalized P/E ratio as calculated by Robert Shiller stands at 23.3. Ed Easterling’s work produces similarly elevated valuation levels. Not only is this well above the long-term average, but it is consistent with very disappointing long-term expected returns.

UPDATE: I was wisely encouraged to consider TOTAL returns, with dividends re-invested
But just how disappointing are returns likely to be? I spent a few hours on Friday afternoon geeking out in excel. I found that when the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio is between 22 and 24 (as it is now) the average annual real returns (after inflation) for the subsequent 10 years is -2.2%! And as usual, the average doesn’t quite tell the whole story. In the 66 month ends since 1881 when the P/E was between 22 and 24 the distribution of subsequent returns looks like this:

 

 

The median total return is -3.1% real. It seems exceedingly likely to me that long-term returns for the stock market from here will be negative. I don’t think most investors are prepared for these sort of outcomes over the next decade.

For those who care to see their returns nominally, the average is +1.2% annual returns and the distributions are as follows:

 

 

Several successful investors use the same concepts to drive actual estimates of future market returns.

John Hussman, PhD uses this methodology to help drive decision making with his mutual funds. His recent work produces estimated NOMINAL returns over the next 10 years of 3.1% annualized which may be close to zero real returns depending on inflation.

Using a 5 year time frame, the “probable outcomes” are even worse, with 0% projected nominal returns.

GMO does similar work with additional emphasis on where profit margins are relative to normal (and likely to revert towards) and does so across various asset classes and publishes their results monthly. These are also nominal returns and are certainly not high enough to warrant a buy and hold or long-only approach especially when one considers that this is just a range of estimates and the downside to low estimates is equally as likely as the upside.

The fact is that what you pay matters and expensive markets today mean low or even negative prospective returns going forward. The value restoration project, which began with the peak of the stock market in 2000, is ongoing despite a 2 year cyclical rebound on the heels of unprecedented stimulus.

Read the Sitka Pacific Annual Review for more on the multitude of challenges facing investors.

Of course, in the short term the market can get more expensive. Those calling for negative returns in 1997 or 1998 based on this sort of methodology were certainly frustrated over the course of the next 2 years as the market when from merely expensive to insanely bubblicious. My colleague Mish had a nice post looking at the returns over various time periods when you start with expensive markets. In the first year the returns ranged from -30% to +33%.
UPDATE: Hussman cites Mish’s work in his latest Weekly Commentary.

I believe this are nominal returns which means that all of those single digit 10 year returns starting in the late 60s were certainly negative after the effects of inflation.

Secular bear markets ALWAYS have powerful rallies which has nothing to do with the fact that bear markets NEVER end until the market is “not just interesting, but rather commandingly, and compellingly cheap.” I don’t portend to have a crystal ball, but it seems to me that our powerful bear market rally is getting rather long in the tooth.


Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions. Any links to Amazon.com may result in compensation to the author via the Amazon Associates program.

Book Review: The Bed of Procrustes by Nassim Taleb

Taleb’s book of Philosophical and Practical Aphorisms is annoyingly brilliant. I am aware of no other intellect who can offer truisms in such an offensive, condescending, righteous, and elitist manner while also endearing, educating, enlightening, and inspiring.
The one word that has always come to mind when I think of Nassim Taleb is arrogant. Based on his aphorism, it sounds like I’m not the only one:

People reserve standard compliments for those who do not threaten their pride; the others they often praise by calling “arrogant.” 

And he’s right. Again. Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan made it clear to the world that Taleb is a first class thinker who can know, to paraphrase one his sayings, a priori what most can only learn a posteriori. The Bed of Procrustes offers readers a much more robust insight into Taleb’s world view and process which is ultimately quite useful for those who seek to find a deeper understanding of the complex world we live in. It may not be surprising that this deeper understanding that Taleb possesses stems from a pursuit that is at odds with the modern, scientific, technological approach to knowledge, but is rooted in one’s ability to remove oneself from constraints, biases, artificial effort, and political and societal norms.

Taleb’s aphorisms (short form writings which contain deep meaning) manage to tell us how to generate ideas without thinking, achieve progress without working, and reveal mysteries without looking. His targets include fields which rely heavily on the idea that what we know is more robust than what we don’t (economics, medicine, academia), those which rely on popular acceptance to be considered influential (politics, journalism, literature) and all who are enslaved by a predictable existence. The aphorisms place a high premium on learning through opening oneself to the universe while knowing how to filter out the noise and avoiding the misidentification of signal. Importantly, many of Taleb’s saying properly identify error not as something that should be considered shameful or feared, but used as an asset from which we can gain insight.

The Bed of Procrustes will serve as a useful resource for those who see the power of short quotes to convey big ideas and those who wish to develop an approach towards understanding what is true before it slaps you in the face.

Disclaimer: The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, including advertisements, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of sponsors or firms affiliated with the author(s). The author may or may not have a position in any company or advertiser referenced above. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or advertisement on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions. Any links to Amazon.com may result in compensation to the author via the Amazon Associates program.